Richard William Claxton v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, Department of Corrections
Opinion
Opinion
995 F.2d 230 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard William CLAXTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Director, Department of Corrections; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16741. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 2, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard William Claxton, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the magistrate judge's order striking Claxton's motion for entry of default and summary judgment. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 "Article III of the United States Constitution imposes limitations upon the role which the magistrates, who are not Article III judges vested with life tenure or salary protections, can play.... [W]ith respect to dispositive matters, a magistrate is only permitted to make recommendations for final disposition by an Article III judge." McKeever v. Block, 932 F.2d 795, 798 (9th Cir.1991). 4 Here,…