Delbert Lee Connor v. Ron Angelone

Good Law
995 F.2d 230·1993 WL 188356·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21278
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 199392-16119California948 words

Opinion

Opinion

995 F.2d 230 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Delbert Lee CONNOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron ANGELONE, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16119. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 2, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 Delbert Lee Connor ("Connor") appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims. Connor contends his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments were violated because the defendants failed to provide him with timely parole hearings. The district court found that claims based on parole hearings due before August 10, 1988 were barred by the statute of limitations. It further found there was no genuine question whether Connor signed a waiver of parole hearings on March 24, 1987. It concluded that this waiver precluded any possible liability for the failure to provide parole…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.