Arthur W. Carson v. Michael Hennessey, Sheriff

995 F.2d 230 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arthur W. CARSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael HENNESSEY, Sheriff, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16542. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 4, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arthur W. Carson, a Texas state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment in favor of defendants San Francisco County Jail officials in Carson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. Carson contends the district court erred by (1) dismissing his claim that he was deprived of property without due process, (2) dismissing his claim that he was placed in administrative segregation in retaliation for filing grievances, and (3) granting summary judgment on his law library access claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim pursuant to…