Robert H. Ketchum, AKA Frank D. Katrla, Jr. And John Shangreaux v. City of Tucson Police

995 F.2d 231 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert H. KETCHUM, aka Frank D. Katrla, Jr. and John Shangreaux, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF TUCSON POLICE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-17021. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 1, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Harrell Ketchum appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against the City of Tucson Police Department, Pima County Adult Detention Center, and the United States Postal Service. Ketchum contends that the district court did not examine his pro se complaint under a "less stringent standard" and incorrectly determined that his complaint failed to state a claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal for failure to state a claim. Buckey v.…