Mauricio Eduardo Hernandez v. United States

995 F.2d 231 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mauricio Eduardo HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee No. 92-55625. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 6, 1993. * Decided June 3, 1993. 1 Before NOONAN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, * * * Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Defendant Mauricio Eduardo Hernandez pled guilty on June 13, 1989 to count two of an indictment charging him with aiding and abetting the possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. 4 Defendant now appeals the district court order denying his motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. Section 2255 . We Affirm. 5 A district court decision on a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct a Sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255 is reviewed de novo. United States v. Quan, 789 F.2d 711 (9th Cir.) cert. dismissed, 478 U.S. 1033 (1986). 6 A claim alleging ineffective assistance of counsel is…