Dennie v. Riegle

995 F.2d 231 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert L. DENNIE; Dolly M. Dennie, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Linda B. RIEGLE, District of Nevada Bankruptcy Judge; Jeffrey G. Sloane; Gary E. Schnitzer; Wells, Kravitz, Schnitzer & Sloane, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16648. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1993. * Decided May 26, 1993. Before HUG, WIGGINS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert L. Dennie and Dolly M. Dennie, pro se, appeal the dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a Federal Bankruptcy Judge, two attorney's, and a law firm. The district court dismissed the action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 12(c). We affirm. 3 * The current action is based upon a prior action heard in United States Bankruptcy Court, case No. BK-85-01264-LBR. The Dennies alleged that a financial institution had foreclosed on their property in violation of an automatic stay. Bankruptcy Judge…