In Re William A. Douglas Cathie A. Douglas, Debtors. Cecil H. Storms v. William A. Douglas Cathie A. Douglas

995 F.2d 231 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re William A. DOUGLAS; Cathie A. Douglas, Debtors. Cecil H. STORMS, Appellant, v. William A. DOUGLAS; Cathie A. Douglas, Appellees. No. 90-35275. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1993. * Decided May 25, 1993. Before HUG, WIGGINS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Cecil H. Storms appeals pro se 1 the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") order affirming the Bankruptcy Court's order sustaining debtor William A. Douglas's objection to Storm's proof of claim. The proof of claim was based on a civil rights action Storms had filed against Douglas. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d). We review de novo the BAP's order, Manufacturers Hanover v. Dewalt (In re Dewalt), 961 F.2d 848, 850 (9th Cir.1992), and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 In September 1985, while acting as County Attorney of Lincoln County, Montana, Douglas filed and prosecuted a felony…