Joel W. Ellington, Dr. v. Nancy Becker, Judge Bob Miller Frankie Sue Del Papa Public Defender Office

Good Law
995 F.2d 231·1993 WL 191860·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22554
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 199392-16964California328 words

Opinion

Opinion

995 F.2d 231 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joel W. ELLINGTON, Dr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy BECKER, Judge; Bob Miller; Frankie Sue Del Papa; Public Defender Office, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16964. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 4, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dr. Joel Ellington, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal, with leave to amend, of his civil rights complaint. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 A district court order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend is not a final appealable order. Hoohuli v. Ariyoshi, 741 F.2d 1169 , 1171 n. 1 (9th Cir.1984); Proud v. United States, 704 F.2d 1099, 1100 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam). 4 Here, Ellington filed a complaint against a Nevada state court judge, the governor of Nevada, the Nevada attorney general, and the Nevada public defender's office…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.