O'Diah v. Applied Risk Management

995 F.2d 232 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Aror Ark O'DIAH, Plaintiff-Appellant. v. APPLIED RISK MANAGEMENT; University of California Regents; Kaiser Hospital, Oakland and Hayward; California State University Chancellor; Alameda Superior Court, Oakland, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15030. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1993. * Decided May 26, 1993. Before: HUG, THOMPSON, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Aror Ark O'Diah appeals pro se the denial of his motion for reconsideration of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the defendants. Liberally construing his pleadings, 1 O'Diah contends that the University of California and Applied Risk Management, the administrator of the University's worker's compensation plan, failed to provide medical attention for a work-related injury and wrongfully denied his disability claim. He further contends that these defendants…