Richard E. Moulton v. Kenneth C. Cory

Good Law
995 F.2d 232·1993 WL 175250·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21355
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 199392-16743California587 words

Opinion

Opinion

995 F.2d 232 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard E. MOULTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth C. CORY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16743. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1993. * Decided May 25, 1993. Before HUG, WIGGINS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard E. Moulton appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of its order denying his request that the court indicate its willingness to entertain his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to vacate judgment. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 1 BACKGROUND 3 On July 19, 1991, the district court dismissed Moulton's legal malpractice action against his former attorney, Kenneth C. Cory, for failure to attend a scheduled deposition. Moulton filed a timely notice of appeal. 4 On July 20, 1992, during the pendency of the appeal, Moulton filed a "Motion for Leave to Apply for Remand from the Court of Appeals and Motion for Relief From…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.