Carol Olden v. Internal Revenue Service, Carol Olden Kolden K. Gopher v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Yakima County State of Washington United States of America City of Seattle Cowlitz Indian Tribe Norwegian Ministry Ford Motor Credit Company

Good Law
995 F.2d 232·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21370
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 199392-36685California691 words

Opinion

Opinion

995 F.2d 232 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carol OLDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. Carol OLDEN; Kolden K. Gopher, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF the YAKIMA INDIAN NATION; Yakima County; State of Washington; United States of America; City of Seattle; Cowlitz Indian Tribe; Norwegian Ministry; Ford Motor Credit Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36685. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 4, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated appeals, Carol Olden appeals pro se the district court's orders denying her applications to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a) in her actions against the Internal Revenue Service and the Yakima Indian Nation. Olden contends the district court erred by finding that she was not impoverished. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.