Joseph v. Nash v. Carl Sparks, Sheriff, of Kern County W.H. Seifert, Warden, of the Metropolitan Detention Center, in Los Angeles

995 F.2d 232 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joseph V. NASH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl SPARKS, Sheriff, of Kern County; W.H. Seifert, Warden, of the Metropolitan Detention Center, in Los Angeles, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-55922. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 4, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joseph Nash appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus. The district court dismissed Nash's habeas petition because he challenged only the conditions of his confinement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We vacate and remand for further proceedings. 3 Nash filed this action on a form designated as a petition for habeas corpus by a federal prisoner. In the petition, Nash challenged various conditions of confinement, including access to the law library, lack of basic hygiene supplies, denial of religious…