Martin K. Maurer v. Ron E. Koenig

995 F.2d 232 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Martin K. MAURER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron E. KOENIG, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15925. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1993. * Decided May 26, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Martin K. Maurer, a California state prisoner serving a life term, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. In an earlier appeal, we vacated the Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of Maurer's due process claims, and remanded for the district court to determine whether Maurer received all the process due at his parole proceedings. Maurer v. Koenig, No. 89-16744, unpublished memorandum disposition (9th Cir. Dec. 11, 1990). Maurer contends that on remand, the district court erred by (1) finding that the California Board of Prison Terms did not deny him…