Ralph Maxim v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary

995 F.2d 232 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ralph MAXIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H. Lawrence GARRETT, III, Secretary, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-56466. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 1, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ralph Maxim appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Navy (Secretary) in his employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (Title VII), alleging retaliation for filing a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Maxim contends that the district court erred by finding that his action was time-barred. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's grant of summary judgment. Scholar v. Pacific Bell, 963 F.2d 264, 266 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 196…