Danny Sanders v. Robert Borg, Warden

995 F.2d 232 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Danny SANDERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert BORG, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-16198. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1993. * Decided May 26, 1993. Before: NORRIS, HALL, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Danny Sanders appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for a writ of habeas corpus. Mr. Sanders contends that his constitutional rights were violated at trial for the following reasons: (1) the trial court did not give the jury a limiting instruction on the use of certain Miranda -violative statements disclosed by the prosecution during cross-examination; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel; (3) the trial court did not give the jury an involuntary manslaughter instruction; (4) members of the jury engaged in misconduct by considering extrinsic evidence; and (5) the prosecutor engaged in misconduct by theatrically reenacting the…