United States v. Clifford Gene Black

995 F.2d 233 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifford Gene BLACK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10419. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1993. * Decided May 27, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Clifford Gene Black appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for interfering with federally protected activities and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 245(b)(2)(F). Black contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 "In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, ... [we] must determine whether, assessing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, 'any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.' " United States v. McInnis, 976 F.2d 1226, 1230 (9th…