United States v. Pauline Douglas

995 F.2d 233 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pauline DOUGLAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30239. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1993. Decided May 28, 1993. Before SKOPIL, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Pauline Douglas appeals her sentence imposed under the Sentencing Guidelines after resentencing. She was originally convicted of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and distribution of cocaine. On appeal, we reversed her conviction for distribution but affirmed her conviction for possession. United States v. Douglas, No. 90-30232 (9th Cir. Oct. 24, 1991). On resentencing, the court declined to reconsider some of the factual findings made at the original sentencing. 3 In this appeal, Douglas contends that the district court erred by rejecting her claims that (1) her offense level should not have been increased for possession of a weapon;…