Spencer Thomas v. Gloria Williams William Mallen City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
995 F.2d 233·1993 WL 179291·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21292
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 199392-15730California1,043 words

Opinion

Opinion

995 F.2d 233 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Spencer THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gloria WILLIAMS; William Mallen; City and County of San Francisco; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15730. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1993. * Decided May 26, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Spencer Thomas appeals pro se the district court's orders dismissing his action and denying his motion for reconsideration. Thomas filed his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against San Francisco Municipal Court Judge William Mallen, the San Francisco Municipal Court, and several private individuals. Thomas claimed that the defendants violated his civil rights in connection with a landlord-tenant dispute litigated in San Francisco Municipal Court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 1 , and we affirm. 2 3 As a preliminary matter, we must determine whether the federal courts have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.