Leif D. Soderling Jay S. Soderling v. U.S. Parole Commission

995 F.2d 233 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leif D. SODERLING; Jay S. Soderling, Petitioners-Appellants, v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-35594. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 7, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leif and Jay Soderling, federal prisoners serving six-year terms of imprisonment following revocation of probation, appeal the district court's denial of their 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition seeking credit for the thirty-one months they spent on probation toward the time they are to spend on parole. We review de novo, Vargas v. United States Parole Comm'n, 865 F.2d 191, 192 (9th Cir.1988), and we affirm. 3 The Soderlings contend that they are entitled to credit toward parole for the time they spent on probation because: (1) 18 U.S.C. § 3568 1 mandates that they receive credit; (2) to deny them credit violates the equal…