United States v. Alfredo Camacho-Nuno

995 F.2d 233 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo CAMACHO-NUNO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30329. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1993. * Decided May 27, 1993. 1 Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Alfredo Camacho-Nuno appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and carrying a firearm during a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1). Camacho-Nuno contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 4 Because Camacho-Nuno failed to renew his Fed.R.Crim.P. 29 motion for acquittal at the close of evidence, we review the sufficiency of the evidence only for plain error. See United States v. Conkins, 987 F.2d 564, 570 (9th Cir.1993). 5 Camacho-Nuno does not…