United States v. Heriberto B.

995 F.2d 234 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HERIBERTO B., Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10562. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 1, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Heriberto B., a juvenile, appeals his conviction following bench trial for an act of juvenile delinquency in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 5031-5037 , specifically, possession with intent to distribute less than 50 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Heriberto contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 "There is sufficient evidence to support a conviction if, reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, 'any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable…