United States v. Demetrius Jerome Hayes

Good Law
995 F.2d 234·1993 WL 195367·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21568
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 199391-30432California1,170 words

Opinion

Opinion

995 F.2d 234 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Demetrius Jerome HAYES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30432. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 3, 1993. Decided June 9, 1993. Before: WRIGHT, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Hayes appeals his conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g), and possession of an unregistered sawed-off shotgun, 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (d). The district court sentenced him as a career offender under the Sentencing Guidelines. He raises three issues regarding suppression of evidence, which we address in this disposition. We address his sentencing issue in a separate published opinion. We affirm the conviction. 3 1. Admission of Hayes' State Trial Testimony 4 Hayes contends that the admission of his state court trial testimony at his federal trial created an "irreconcilable conflict"…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.