United States v. Milton Donovan Olson, United States of America v. Bryan D. Olson

995 F.2d 234 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Milton Donovan OLSON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryan D. OLSON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-30395, 92-30425. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1993. * Decided May 27, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated appeals, Milton Donovan Olson and Bryan D. Olson (The Olsons) appeal the denial of their Fed.R.Crim.P. 33 motion for a new trial following their convictions for mail fraud, respectively, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 , 1342. The Olsons contend that the district court erred by denying their motion based upon newly-discovered evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review for abuse of discretion a district court's denial of a Rule 33 motion on the basis of newly discovered evidence.…