United States v. Ismail W. Shaheed

Good Law
995 F.2d 234·1993 WL 190850·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21497
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 199392-30132California1,449 words

Opinion

Opinion

995 F.2d 234 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ismail W. SHAHEED, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30132. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1993. * Decided June 3, 1993. 1 Before Pregerson, Kleinfeld, Circuit Judges, and LEGGE, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 A jury convicted defendant Shaheed of being an ex-felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). He appeals. Specifically, Shaheed challenges the district court's denial of his motion to suppress a firearm that the police obtained as a result of a warrantless search of his apartment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. BACKGROUND 4 On December 12, 1990, Shaheed was involved in a car accident. He returned to the apartment that he shared with his ex-wife, Penny Rose, to lie down because he was not feeling well. Shortly thereafter, Rose also arrived at the apartment. She…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.