United States v. Edison L. Retizos

995 F.2d 234 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edison L. RETIZOS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10520. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 2, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edison L. Retizos appeals the sentence of 30 months imprisonment imposed after a jury convicted him of five counts of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 and seventeen counts of making false statements on loan applications in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 . Retizos contests the district court's determination that the amount of "loss" for purposes of calculating his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(1) was the amount he obtained as a result of his check-kiting schemes and false statements, regardless of amounts paid back or secured with collateral. We affirm. 3 Retizos appears to argue that the district court should have…