United States v. Jerry Allen Silva, AKA Jesse Vega, United States of America v. Kimbel Le Maux, United States of America v. Paul Inrig

Good Law
995 F.2d 234
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 15, 199392-10006California4,313 words

Opinion

Opinion

995 F.2d 234 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Allen SILVA, aka Jesse Vega, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimbel LE MAUX, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul INRIG, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10006, 92-10007 and 92-10116. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 1, 1993. Decided May 28, 1993. As Amended Sept. 15, 1993. 1 Before FLETCHER, REINHARDT and NOONAN, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Jerry A. Silva, Kimbel LeMaux, and Paul Inrig (appellants) appeal their convictions for conspiracy to possess and to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. They contend that the jury instructions on multiple conspiracies failed to protect their right to jury unanimity and that the prosecutor's argument invited conviction based upon a time-barred offense. Appellants also claim that reversal is required by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.