United States v. Michael Herman

995 F.2d 234 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael HERMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10257. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 2, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Herman appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines upon conviction by guilty plea of conspiring to violate 18 U.S.C. § 513 by passing counterfeited travelers checks, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 . Herman claims that the district court abused its discretion in ordering Herman to pay $30,100 in restitution and to participate in a substance abuse program as a condition of his supervised release. We conclude that Herman is barred from raising most of these issues for the first time upon review, and the remainder of his claims are meritless; we therefore affirm. 3 * Herman challenges the restitution award on the grounds that it…