Clarence Wilson v. City of Berkeley

995 F.2d 235 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Clarence WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16586. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 2, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Clarence Wilson appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for the City of Berkeley, seven police officers, the Chief of Police and the City Manager in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that police officers used excessive force in arresting him and were negligent in the handling of his urine sample. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291, and we affirm. 3 In a prior appeal, we upheld the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants, in part, and reversed and remanded the district court's summary judgment on Wilson's claims that the police officers used excessive force in arresting him. On remand, the district…