Randal N. Wiideman v. Tom McNevin

995 F.2d 235 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randal N. WIIDEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom McNEVIN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16798. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 2, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Randal Wiideman, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against correctional officer Tom McNevin. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm. 3 Wiideman filed a civil rights complaint alleging McNevin violated Wiideman's 14th Amendment due process rights by deliberately destroying certain handicraft items in Wiideman's possession following Wiideman's transfer from Ely State Prison…