Ronald Dennis Wolff v. George Deeds, Warden

Good Law
995 F.2d 235·1993 WL 188365·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21246
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 199391-16641California755 words

Opinion

Opinion

995 F.2d 235 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald Dennis WOLFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George DEEDS, Warden, et al Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16641. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 25, 1993. * Decided June 2, 1993. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nevada state prisoner Ronald D. Wolff appeals pro se from the district court's judgment, following a bench trial, in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the conditions in the Southern Desert Correctional Center (SDCC) protective custody unit violated his constitutional rights. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Wolff contends that the prison conditions at the SDCC violated his right's under the eighth and fourteenth amendments because he was forced to double cell with another inmate and because he had limited opportunity to exercise. These contentions lack merit. 4 We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.