United States v. Windyceslau D. Lorenzo, United States of America v. Roger Elvick, United States of America v. Nathan K. Brown, United States of America v. Ron Knutt, United States of America v. Thomas Porter

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 5932·995 F.2d 1448·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10548·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3426
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 199391-10506California6,574 words

Opinion

Opinion

995 F.2d 1448 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Windyceslau D. LORENZO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger ELVICK, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathan K. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ron KNUTT, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas PORTER, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-10506 to 91-10509 and 91-10513. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1992. * Decided May 11, 1993. Richard T. Pafundi, Honolulu, HI, for defendant-appellant Lorenzo. Lane Y. Takahashi, Honolulu, HI, for defendant-appellant Elvick. Thomas D. Collins, III, Honolulu, HI, for defendant-appellant Brown. Wayne H. Tashima, Honolulu, HI, for defendant-appellant Knutt. Robert Finlay, Honolulu, HI, for defendant-appellant Porter. Lawrence L. Tong, Asst. U.S. Atty., Honolulu, HI, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. Before GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: 1 This appeal raises a number of issues concerning…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.