Travis M. Bentz v. G.H. Baldwin, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution

Good Law
996 F.2d 1223·1993 WL 230242·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22615
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 199392-36589California827 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1223 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Travis M. BENTZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. G.H. BALDWIN, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-36589. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided June 29, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Travie M. Bentz, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Bentz contends that the evidence proffered by the state was insufficient to support his conviction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's decision to deny a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Mikes v. Borg, 947 F.2d 353, 356 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 3055 (1992). In determining whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction, we must view that evidence in the light most…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.