Ayodelle Aigbevbolle v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

996 F.2d 1223 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ayodelle AIGBEVBOLLE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70626. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided June 29, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ayodelle Aigbevbolle, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") denial of his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a), and we deny Aigbevbolle's petition for review. 3 In the motion to reopen, Aigbevbolle's counsel alleged that he had discovered material evidence which was not available and could not have been presented at Aigbevbolle's deportation hearing. 1 The BIA denied Aigbevbolle's motion to reopen, determining that he had failed to establish reasonable cause for his failure to appear at the hearing.…