Demola Adesanya v. United States

996 F.2d 1223 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Demola ADESANYA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15621. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 14, 1993. * Decided June 16, 1993. Before: GOODWIN, NORRIS, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Demola Adesanya, a Nigerian citizen, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his action against the United States alleging false arrest, false imprisonment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We affirm. 3 In February 1989, Adesanya was arrested by the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") and charged with deportability under 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(1) for having been excludable at entry as an intending immigrant without a valid immigrant visa. An immigration judge found Adesanya deportable, but, the Board of Immigration Appeals reversed, finding that the INS had failed to establish the…