Demola Adesanya v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

996 F.2d 1223 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Demola ADESANYA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15338. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 14, 1993. * Decided June 16, 1993. Before: GOODWIN, NORRIS, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Demola Adesanya appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action seeking a writ of mandamus and money damages against the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") for wrongfully denying his application for work authorization, instituting deportation proceedings in violation of 8 C.F.R. §§ 215.2 (a) and 215.3(h), and engaging in tortious conduct against him. Adesanya argues that the INS's motion to dismiss was procedurally deficient and that the district court erred in failing to enter a default judgment in his favor. We affirm the order of the district court. 3 Adesanya filed his complaint on August 7,…