Barrett v. Atkins

996 F.2d 1223 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth Don BARRETT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lowell Bruce ATKINS, Resident Agent in charge at FBI office in Phoenix, AZ; jointly & separately in his individual & official capacity, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16649. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 18, 1993. MEMORANDUM ** Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 Kenneth Don Barrett, Jr. appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(a). Barrett contends the district court erred by denying his motion for reconsideration because Barrett clearly demonstrated the district court made a mistake when it dismissed his action pursuant to Local Rule 11(i) of Arizona. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We vacate and remand. 1 2 We review a district court's denial of a Rule 60 motion for abuse of discretion.…