Vicente L. Arcega v. Taylor Enterprises Yuvetta Robinson Joe Brumfield Pasadena Housing Authority City of Pasadena Municipal Court of Pasadena

Good Law
996 F.2d 1223·1993 WL 170945·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22593
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 199392-56208California850 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1223 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vicente L. ARCEGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TAYLOR ENTERPRISES; Yuvetta Robinson; Joe Brumfield; Pasadena Housing Authority; City of Pasadena; Municipal Court of Pasadena, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56208. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 27, 1993. * Decided May 20, 1993. Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Vicente L. Arcega appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in Arcega's action alleging that defendants wrongfully denied him federal housing aid. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's summary judgment. McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1992). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, we must determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.