Richard Harris v. J.L. Sivley, Warden

Good Law
996 F.2d 1224·1993 WL 210672·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22448
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 15, 199392-15429California1,422 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1224 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.L. SIVLEY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-15429. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 15, 1993. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The appellant challenges the denial of parole by the Parole Commission (Commission) and the National Appeals Board (NAB) claiming that the reasons given for the denial were not sufficiently particular, that the parole guidelines are arbitrary and capricious, and that the Attorney General no longer has the statutory authority to keep him in custody. We affirm. I. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS 3 Appellant Harris was convicted of interstate transportation of forged securities, bank fraud, and mail fraud. In September of 1988, the district court imposed a sentence of five years and ordered him to pay restitution in the amount of $1,052,250. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.