Eugene Hamilton v. S.M. Sandor

996 F.2d 1224 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eugene HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.M. SANDOR, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15242. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 16, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Eugene Hamilton appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing as frivolous all but one of his civil rights claims. Because the district court's order is not a final order, we dismiss the appeal. 3 We raise sua sponte the issue of our jurisdiction to hear this appeal. See Abernathy v. Southern California Edison, 885 F.2d 525, 527 (9th Cir.1989). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , we have jurisdiction over appeals from final orders of the district court. A district court order dismissing an action as to only some of the defendants is not a final order pursuant to section 1291. Unioil, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton & Co., 809 F.2d…