Louis Gorenc v. Robert R. Bean, Honorable, Presiding Judge of the Superior Court of Pinal County, Az

Good Law
996 F.2d 1224·1993 WL 230199·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22464
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 199393-15265California771 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1224 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Louis GORENC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert R. BEAN, Honorable, Presiding Judge of the Superior Court of Pinal County, AZ, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15265. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided June 28, 1993. Before: SNEED, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Louis Gorenc appeals pro se the district court's order denying his request to proceed in forma pauperis in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The district court found that Gorenc's action was frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion. Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992). We affirm. 3 A plaintiff may be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis if his complaint is frivolous. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 321, 324 (1989). A complaint is frivolous "where it lacks an arguable basis either…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.