McIntyre v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
996 F.2d 1225·1993 WL 239525·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22496
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 199392-16138California1,056 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1225 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rene McINTYRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; Safeway Stores, Inc.; Western Security Bureau, Cathern (Sgt.) of Western Security Bureau (563-5959); Safeway House Security "Lopez"; Safeway Manager "Harvey Leong; Safeway Stores, Inc.; Tong, Officer; Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16138. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided July 1, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rene McIntyre appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City and County of San Francisco, Safeway Stores and San Francisco Police Officer Tong. The action arose from an incident in which Safeway employees suspected McIntyre of shoplifting. The district court dismissed the suit for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm. BACKGROUND 3 Safeway employees observed McIntyre in a store aisle, folding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.