Karim-Panahi v. California Dept. of Transp.

996 F.2d 1225 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Parviz KARIM-PANAHI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; Los Angeles County Transportation Commission; Metro Rail Transit Consultants; Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall; Ralph M. Parsons Company; De Leuw, Cather & Company; Bechtel Civil Inc.; G.V. Diversified; Jenkins, Gales & Martinez; D'Leon Consulting Engineers; Ralph Stone Company; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55698. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 18, 1993. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Parviz Karim-Panahi appeals pro se the district court's (1) denial of his motions for preliminary injunction and for disqualification of the district judge, (2) grant of the defendants' motions to set aside entry of default, and (3) dismissal for failure to state a claim of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the California…