Hacharan Kang v. Omni Technology and Micro Semi Corp.

996 F.2d 1225 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Hacharan KANG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OMNI TECHNOLOGY and Micro Semi Corp., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15313. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 13, 1992. Decided June 17, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Hacharan S. Kang appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the movants, defendants-appellees Omni Technology ("Omni") and Micro Semi Corporation ("Micro"), Omni's parent corporation. Kang's claims below consisted of Title VII claims of racial and religious discrimination, and claims of discrimination under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 and in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. BACKGROUND AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW 3 Kang applied for three positions at Omni: Senior Sentry Test Engineer, Analog Test…