Anthony Edward Mack v. Jerry Stainer, Warden

996 F.2d 1225 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anthony Edward MACK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jerry STAINER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-16033. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 21, 1993. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony E. Mack, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Mack pled guilty to fourteen counts of a thirty-six count indictment alleging rape and robbery. He was sentenced to life plus eight years. Mack contends that trial counsel was ineffective, that the prosecutor breached the plea agreement, and that his plea was not entered knowingly and voluntarily. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings. Discussion A. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel 3 This court reviews…