Craig B. Malone v. George Ingle, Warden, Mule Creek State Prison

996 F.2d 1225 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Craig B. MALONE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George INGLE, Warden, Mule Creek State Prison, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-17018. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided July 2, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Craig Malone appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 While on probation for an earlier conviction, Malone was charged by information with fourteen counts of corporal injury and sexual offenses against minors. The parties stipulated that the probation revocation hearing would take place concurrently with the jury trial on the information charges. The jury found Malone guilty on three charges (corporal injury to spouse, corporal injury to child, and child annoyance),…