Maurice McDonald v. David Hatch, Detective Richard K. Good, Sr., Police Officer Charles Paine Robert Lucherini

996 F.2d 1225 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Maurice McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David HATCH, Detective; Richard K. Good, Sr., Police Officer; Charles Paine; Robert Lucherini, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15572. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided July 1, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Maurice McDonald, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Oscar v. University Students Co-op, Ass'n, 965 F.2d 783, 785 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 655 (1992). We affirm. In addition, we impose sanctions on counsel for appellees Hatch and Good. 3 * Background 4 McDonald filed an amended complaint against the Las Vegas Metro Police Department…