Orra Penn Nateroj, Haim Habib v. Hisashi Haruyama, Kokuba Corporation (u.s.a.), Chiyoda Corporation (Guam)

Good Law
996 F.2d 1226·1993 WL 219862·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21987
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 199392-15880California1,889 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1226 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Orra Penn NATEROJ, Plaintiff, Haim Habib, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hisashi HARUYAMA, Kokuba Corporation (U.S.A.), Chiyoda Corporation (Guam), Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15880. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 4, 1993. * Decided June 21, 1993. Before GOODWIN, TANG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Haim Habib appeals the sanctions imposed on him by the Superior Court of Guam and affirmed by the Appellate Division of the District Court for the District of Guam. After dismissing with prejudice a complaint filed by Habib, the Superior Court imposed the sanctions under Rule 11 of the Guam Rules of Civil Procedure, which is identical to its counterpart in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Appellate Division found the imposition of sanctions was not an abuse of discretion. We affirm. ALLEGATIONS 3 The complaint, which Habib filed on behalf of his client Orra…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.