Larry P. Parrott v. A.J. Arave, Warden I.M.S.I.

996 F.2d 1226 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Larry P. PARROTT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A.J. ARAVE, Warden I.M.S.I., Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-35850. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 14, 1992. Decided June 30, 1993. 1 Before: WRIGHT, FLETCHER, and CANBY, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Idaho prisoner Larry Peter Parrott appeals the district court's denial of his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus. Parrott contends that he was deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. Parrott also maintains that the district court abused its discretion in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing on his claim and in failing to appoint counsel for Parrott. Because we are convinced that Parrott was not prejudiced by his trial counsel's conduct, we affirm the district court's denial of Parrott's petition. DISCUSSION 4 We review de novo the district court's denial of Parrott's…