Jorge Ortiz-Salazar v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
996 F.2d 1226·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21989
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 199392-70815California919 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1226 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jorge ORTIZ-SALAZAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70815. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 18, 1993. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ortiz-Salazar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") summary dismissal of his appeal for failure to adequately specify the grounds for the appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1 (d)(1-a)(i). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a and grant the petition for review. 3 * Background 4 On July 22, 1991, Ortiz-Salazar was issued an order to show cause ("OSC") why he should not be deported pursuant to section 241(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act ("Act"), 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(2)(A)(ii), as an alien convicted of two or more crimes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.