Monir Memarpuri v. Alameda County

996 F.2d 1226 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Monir MEMARPURI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15075. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 18, 1993. Decided June 23, 1993. Before LAY, * HUG and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This is an appeal from binding arbitration in a Title VII action alleging hostile work environment and discrimination based on national origin. Appellant Monir Memarpuri challenges the arbitration panel's decision rejecting her claims. We affirm. 3 Appellant initially brought this action in the district court alleging wrongful discrimination and harassment based on her Iranian descent. Appellant is an account clerk for Alameda County. After filing a complaint with the EEOC, appellant sued in federal district court. The district court dismissed the case as to some defendants, ruling that appellant failed to exhaust administrative remedies and…